Re: Parallax
- From: "oriel36" <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Apr 2007 07:04:12 -0700
On Apr 3, 5:09 am, "Ben" <bet71...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike,
That is really interesting. I had only a vague idea
how those early measurements were made and no
idea that the plates were replicated.
I also believed you could get a fair measurement
by photographing at 90 degree increments instead
of 180. You are opening up an exciting and intricate
study of celestial geometry pioneered by the great
Seventeenth Century innovators: Newton, Bradley,
Flamsteed, and brought to culmination by ESA's
HIPPARCOS.
Do carry on,
Ben
The innovators,as you call them,introduced celestial sphere geometry
into heliocentric reasoning thereby destroying the insights of
Copernicus,Kepler and Roemer and the methods they employed to present
their acvhievements to humanity.
It is therefore impossible to affirm the great Copernican insight for
the Earth's and the other planets heliocentric orbital motion when
people correlate axialrotation to celestial sphere geometry in 23
hours 56 minutes 04 seconds.The reason for this is that the original
Copernican insight used the faster orbital motion of the Earth to
explain the observed behavior of the planets leaving axial rotation
to explain the observed behavior of the Sunor rather the daily cycle.
The pre-Copernican Equation of Time correction which generates the 24
hour day average and how each of these 24 hour days elapse into the
next 24 hour day was then overlaid on the daily cycle where 4 minutes
of clock time represent 1 degree of geographical seperation thereby
clocks correlate with the daily cycle and terrestrial longitudes at
the precise value of 24 hours/360 degrees.It is probably the greatest
practical achievement of the last millenia arising from astronomy yet
men choose an alternative value.
The reason Newton could compltely obliterate the Copernican approach
and resolution of retrogrades is because of Flamsteed's false proof
for axial rotation which introduced celestial sphere geometry to
justify the motions of the Earth -
"For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct,
sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun
they are always seen direct.." Newton
Every participant here will use the 24 hour system devised by the
heliocentric astronomers which keep clocks in sync with axial rotation
at 4 minutes for each degree of rotation making exactly 24 hours/360
degrees.It is a result of the original Copernican insight which
resolved the apparent motion of the other planets through a faster
orbitally moving Earth -
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0112/JuSa2000_tezel.gif
For all the people who visit this forum daily,not one single person
has ever affirmed that there is a huge difference between the actual
timelapse footage which explicitly states that we do see heliocentric
motion from a moving Earth and the false Newtonian conception which
determines that we do not nor the original error by Flamsteed -
"... our clocks kept so good a correspondence with the Heavens that I
doubt it not but they would prove the revolutions of the Earth to be
isochronical..." Flamsteed wrote in a letter in 1677
The emergence of clocks and magnification equipment in the 17th
century led to the 'innovations' which turn out to be little more than
mutations designed for observational conveniences rather than the
pursuit of astronomy contained in the cycles of the Earth and how to
use them to read the celestial arenafor structure based on physical
considerations.
Watching the destruction of heliocentric reasoning by the late 17th
century guys is an incredibly disappointing experience,why otherwise
successful men would choose to undo the major achievements which
belong to all humanity can only be seen in light of their attempt to
promote the observational convenience of the Ra/Dec system.In
short,they tried to force astronomy into the human devised principle
of the 24 hour day and the clock.
The loss has turned far more personal than I had ever imagined it
would,not the anger or contempt for the late 17th century maneuvering
but rather the loss of so much work by so many people stretching back
to remote antiquity.There is no burden attached to the ancient work
but there is a burden untangling the 17th century mutations from the
original sacred reasoning of not just the heliocentric astronomers but
the pre-Copernican men as well.
.
- References:
- Re: Parallax
- From: Ben
- Re: Parallax
- Prev by Date: Re: Birthday gift
- Next by Date: MOON - Apr 5, 07
- Previous by thread: Re: Parallax
- Next by thread: Re: Parallax
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
