Re: E=mc2

In article <1153859539.572615.73130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
oriel36 <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One guy at a keyboard clinically demolishing the Newtonian junk with
ease and satisfaction.The better part is presenting the new and
exciting productive avenues while you polish your mirrors and do little
else.

Except, you've never done any such thing. All you do is repeat the same
assertions, in an extremely long-winded and obtuse manner. You provide
no evidence or references. If you wish people to understand, and
possibly be convinced by, your arguments, they should:

1) be concise.

2) be in plain English. It's a common trick with weak arguments to
dress them up in complex and verbose language to make them seem more
impressive than they are. Politicians use this all the time, as I'm
sure you are aware.

3) contain references to published works, or experimental results.
Otherwise, all that we have are baseless assertions and personal opinions.

4) not contain emotive or derogatory references to those that do not
agree with you (and that goes for your opponents on this list too - some
unsavoury labels have been slung your way, and that's not on either)

Merely repeating yourself doesn't achieve anything. It irritates most
of the people on this list, and probably just makes you even more worked
up.

Tim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
    ... and the theory of evolution than the vast majority of working ... scientists whose work has been repeatedly referenced in this thread? ... Your references rarely back your POV. ... Continuing to repeat ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The security of a free state?
    ... When you repeat something without evidence, ... Gun Control. ... 1980 and mostly reams of references to ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: DeLaney turns Science into a form of faith-based zealotry instead
    ... groupings in the taxonomist's tree. ... I and others have confronted you with references to it repeatedly, but you do not even acknowledge the references. ... I repeat: You are delusional. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evaluating References in Code [Long]
    ... repeat step 3. ... > the References collection of the Application object, ... > references of the specific database or access project that is currently ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • RE: Monster of a formula!!
    ... adjust the references in the column DJ formula accordingly. ... The first three columns repeat themselves in the last three. ... out and search for it in one of the six columns mentioned earlier, DA-DF. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)