Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon <Klazmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2006 14:21:48 +1200
Steve Taylor <smtaylor@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:44396887$0$5006$db0fefd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Bill Kelly wrote:
For those with open minds I would mention that the most obvious
evidence
as to whether evolution is even possible is in the area of genetics,
and in the structures of the cell. Looking at the actual genetic
mutations which we see in animals today, we can see than in most cases
the resulting life is not viable. And that really significant changes
just don't happen, and cannot.
Exactly MOST changes are fatal, but NOT all, some have slight side
effects.
This is not correct. Most mutations have no effect whatever. Most of them
are in non coding regions. Even most mutations to coding regions cause no
appreciable phenotypic change.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mutations.html
Klazmon
<SNIP>
.
- References:
- the moons size coincidence?
- From: Hayley
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: garry parker
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Weatherlawyer
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Robbie Mayhem
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Weatherlawyer
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: TeaTime
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Weatherlawyer
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Stephen Tonkin
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Bill Kelly
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Stephen Tonkin
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Bill Kelly
- Re: the moons size coincidence?
- From: Steve Taylor
- the moons size coincidence?
- Prev by Date: Re: the moons size coincidence?
- Next by Date: Re: Proportion of stars in our galaxy question
- Previous by thread: Re: the moons size coincidence?
- Next by thread: Re: the moons size coincidence?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading