Re: Galileo's scope
- From: "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:36:32 -0000
Roger Hamlett <rogerspamignored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2_LLf.15638$gB4.7507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Mark" <rollocks@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u1ouv1pecp5bu7dfa3gcke9ojgojdu2f6p@xxxxxxxxxx
Considering you can spend 200squids on a telescope and just manage toFor the time, yes. However the view through even a scope like the most
see a single ring around Saturn, and some of the moons as dots, which
is Galileo saw some centuries ago, I'm assuming that whilst he
obviously benefitted from next to no light pollution, he must have had
some nifty optics for the time?
basic $50 'starter scope', is probably better...
A huge amount is down to your own eyesight, the lack of light pollution,
looking again and again, and actually learning to 'see'. The magnification
was slightly higher than would be offered by most binoculars, but suffered
from massive aberrations away from the centre of the FOV, and a lot of
chromatic aberration.
For £200, _on the days when seeing is good_, you should be able to achieve
perhaps 5*the resolution his scope was capable of.
Best Wishes
What was the optical aberration that lead both Schiaparelli
and Lowell to see as canali on Mars ? or was it
a mind's eye thing ? ie can it be replicated today ?
.
- References:
- Galileo's scope
- From: Mark
- Re: Galileo's scope
- From: Roger Hamlett
- Galileo's scope
- Prev by Date: Re: Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
- Next by Date: Re: Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
- Previous by thread: Re: Galileo's scope
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo's scope
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading