Re: Star formation
- From: Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:13:41 +0000
John Brockbank wrote:
"Sjouke Burry" <burrynulnulfour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:43fcc0c5$0$2016$ba620dc5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John Brockbank wrote:
Sorry if this is an FAQ, but it5 has long made me wonder and I have never seen an explanation.
The Earth massive as it is, is too slight to have hydrogen in the atmosphere. I think that is because the speed of the molecules exceeds, just about, the escape velocity. Given that, how did stars form from hydrogen?
Surface gravity at the sun 27 G?(260 /s/s)
And that is for a yellow dwarf.
Even Jupiter/Saturn/neptune hold onto their
hydrogen pretty well.
Of course once a star has formed it has a strong gravity field. However, presumably a vary large volume of hydrogen, having a huge mass, in fact will have a low gravitational force because it is spread out (inverse square law).
For any given density of material there is some ultimate size beyond which a clump of matter will necessarily and inevitably contract into ever tighter clumps until stars are formed. There are some really nice simulations online at a cosmological scale and star cluster scales too.
Sorry, but I do not think this is a no-brainer.
It only requires that there is enough attractive force from the clump of material to ensure that parts of it slowly become ever denser.
There was a very nice illustrated talk about this at Astrofest by Matthew Bates of Exeter, simulations in video for braodband only at:
http://www.astro.ex.ac.uk/people/mbate/
Regards,
Martin Brown
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Star formation
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: Star formation
- References:
- Star formation
- From: John Brockbank
- Re: Star formation
- From: Sjouke Burry
- Re: Star formation
- From: John Brockbank
- Star formation
- Prev by Date: Re: Greek Mythology
- Next by Date: Re: Stellarium software
- Previous by thread: Re: Star formation
- Next by thread: Re: Star formation
- Index(es):