Re: faliure so far trying to see mars - Mars2.jpg (0/1)



On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:54:10 +0000, Pete Lawrence
<pete.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:37:23 +0000, Clive <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>>You're view is probably what you should be seeing. What sort of
>>>telescope are you using? If it's an SCT or a reflector, is it
>>>collimated? Have you allowed enough time for the scope to cool. A
>>>couple of hours outside in the dark will normally sort that issue out
>>>but even then it can vary depending on the type of scope and the
>>>temperature it's been brought out from.
>>>
>>>What time did you make your attempt? If it was early, the light from
>>>Mars would have been coming through a thick layer of wobbly atmosphere
>>>- made even wose if you are viewing it above a heat source.
>>>
>>>Were your optics dew/frost(!) free? If not, a 12V hairdryer will sort
>>>them out on the beach.
>>>
>>>Visually, you really need a medium to large scope to get much out of
>>>Mars. A small scope will show some surface markings and perhaps a
>>>polar cap or two (the North Polar Hood should be visible but the South
>>>Polar Cap is currently tiny). Images may give expectations of seeing
>>>things that you just won't pick up visually. I showed someone one of
>>>my webcam AVIs that lead to a reasonable finished image recently. They
>>>were gobsmacked that processing techniques have advanced so much that
>>>they can pull such detail ouf from that wobbly little disk.
>>
>>
>>Im using an 8inch SCT, i checked the collimation and left it outside
>>for a few hrs before i tried, i will have another go tonight
>
>If you can, try upping the magnification a bit too by using a Barlow.
>For visual work, coloured filters (e.g. take a look at the Orion
>Optics site, http://www.orionoptics.co.uk/) can help to bring out
>subtle detail. Carrying out successful visual planetary observations
>is also about having patience and experience. If your eye isn't
>trained to 'see' the detail then you'll have to train it. A trained
>observer will be able to see detail that will astound an inexperienced
>one.
>
>This includes being able to watch for those elusive moments when the
>atmosphere seems to stop moving altogether. They don't happen very
>often (especially in the UK) but they do happen.


well i got a result tonight... im happy, its rubbish by your standards
but at least im getting something now :)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: faliure so far trying to see mars
    ... If it's an SCT or a reflector, ... Have you allowed enough time for the scope to cool. ... >>>couple of hours outside in the dark will normally sort that issue out ... >>>polar cap or two (the North Polar Hood should be visible but the South ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: faliure so far trying to see mars
    ... If it's an SCT or a reflector, ... Have you allowed enough time for the scope to cool. ... >>couple of hours outside in the dark will normally sort that issue out ... i checked the collimation and left it outside ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: MEMO to Meade: How to write an honest news release
    ... can get more money if they claim it is an R-C derivative. ... If you simply tell the truth, that it is an SCT, you can't get ... people to pay as much money. ... claiming a scope has ED glass when it doesn't. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: leveling a tripod
    ... azimuth pivot of the mount to the celestial pole. ... needs to be aligned to the celestial polar axis. ... it's because your scope is then not polar aligned properly. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Tonight I start the adventure
    ... > a good all around choice in a scope. ... that is as versatile as the SCT. ... > At my club's last meeting, a member brought in a new Meade 8" LX-200GPS, ... > wet a bit, and make a sound decision what your personal needs will be, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)