Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- From: "Chris Taylor" <nothing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:35:38 GMT
"Robin Leadbeater" <robin_astro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dgkibq$bq8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The 740 is the original Toucam Pro, (cream case) The 840 is the Pro II
> (silver case) No functional difference AFAIK. Just the case. In fact IMO
> the
> 740 is the better bet as the USB cable is longer. You will need a eyepiece
> adapter. An IR blocking filter is useful to help get the colours right
> and
> to minimise atmospheric chromatic abberation and is essential if you are
> using an achromatic refractor, though the filter on the back of the lens
> could be removed and pressed into service, mounted at the bottom of the
> adapter at a pinch.
Thanks Robin.
I ordered a Toucam Pro II this morning and already have an eyepiece adapter
and IR Blocking filter. I offered the adapter away free a few months ago and
the chap didn't seem to want it. How fortunate for me..
Looking forward to seeing what this can do, if I can get a decent night I'll
post some comparison images between the LPI and Toucam.
Regards
Chris
.
- References:
- Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- From: Robin Leadbeater
- Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- From: Chris Taylor
- Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- From: Robin Leadbeater
- Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- Prev by Date: Re: Leaving scope outdoors...?
- Next by Date: Re: Can a black hole feed more than once?!
- Previous by thread: Re: LPI vs Toucam?
- Next by thread: Cornado PST
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|