Re: A load of balls?
- From: Rexx Magnus <trashcan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Apr 2006 15:38:29 GMT
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:41:17 GMT, Dirk Bruere scrawled:
I'm sure that is true, but OTOH one would also expect most of the photos
taken within seconds of each other to show them, which they don't. Also,
my camera (Fuji Finepix) is more of a 'mini SLR' type than the usual
flat digital model. Fiona's camera was of the usual type, but she got
her 'orb' outside in daylight.
A proper SLR shouldn't be quite as prone to 'orbs' as a standard compact
digital, due to having variable focus. Sometimes it can get thrown off,
and only needs to be a very tiny alteration of focus not to show dust up.
I could imagine getting lots of them intermittently if I'd taken pictures
over the weekend at cosmeston, as there was a fair bit of dust blowing in
through the doors of the cottage I was in.
--
http://www.rexx.co.uk
To email me, visit the site.
http://www.rexx.co.uk/runes/ - personal online rune readings
.
- References:
- A load of balls?
- From: Dirk Bruere
- Re: A load of balls?
- From: Jackdaw
- Re: A load of balls?
- From: Rexx Magnus
- Re: A load of balls?
- From: Dirk Bruere
- Re: A load of balls?
- From: Mike Hubbard
- Re: A load of balls?
- From: Dirk Bruere
- A load of balls?
- Prev by Date: Re: A load of balls?
- Next by Date: Re: Eeek!
- Previous by thread: Re: A load of balls?
- Next by thread: Re: A load of balls?
- Index(es):