Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: "Phoenix" <Dong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:59:57 GMT
"Nuala" <nuala-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4d9e508935nuala-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <Kj9Oe.22443$es2.305257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Phoenix <Dong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
>> Patronising? quaint word, but totally wrong interpretation of my
>> intent.
>
> To be fair though, you didn't answer the question that she asked.
I took the trouble to give it some thought and made a considered
response to what I perceived as the question. Unfortunately, an
individual's answer to a question isn't always what's expected, or
desired. That doesn't mean it should be scorned.
<smile>.. I notice Jackdaw has responded in similar manner... <perhaps I
should pass him a brolly?.. whoops too late..>.. so that makes a trio of
replies in similiar vein. Mileages may vary, but it seems we were all
foolishly incompetent to even consider ourselves worthy, of offering our
inconsequential opinions to so Grand a Dame..:-)
> I suspect you've misread how far along she is. Which is a pity.
I don't know her and, <based on the abrasive attitude currently
displayed>, see little reason to change that.
>> No problem.. I'll spare you any further annoyance, by simply
>> ignoring
>> your posts..
>
> Like I said: Pity, that.
Yes, a pity, but I'm not here to trade insults, so any further replies
to her posts seem pointless. We all have bad days... I could happily
reciprocate, in response to a simple sorry, but the high horse is a poor
delivery vehicle for such and I wont be holding my breath. :-)
>> > --
>> > Lady Nina
>> > Today is not the day to piss me off, tomorrow isn't looking good
>> > either.
>
>> --
>> P
>> May those days be long, and many......
>
> I'm going to reflect that I think that's uncalled for,
The tone of her replies, to Matt and Myself, triggered a similar
thought.. like begets like and it was no more than returned sarcasm. If
she believes it was more, then she flatters herself unduly.
> since you could reasonably be expected to have read the 'After the
> Funeral' thread.
Actually, that thread was amongst 193 unreads. Following your prompt
I've scanned it and can sympathise.. imo, grief should be dealt with in
private... sorry if that sounds harsh.
> ~Love and blessings~
>
> --
> ~Phenobarbidoll~
> 'Occasionally I am callous and strange.'
Likewise...
> 'I'm planning your death, but, in a happy way.' - Riley, BtVS
.... and my plans, for that celebration, are similar.. :-)
--
P
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Nuala
- Grief, was:Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: janet
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- References:
- Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Lady Nina
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: root
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Lady Nina
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Lady Nina
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- From: Nuala
- Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- Prev by Date: Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- Next by Date: Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- Next by thread: Grief, was:Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|