Re: Post Modernism
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax <dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 23:16:07 +0100
janet wrote:
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
janet wrote:
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
It fails because it does not empower those who embrace it,
unless
it
is embraced in a partisan, hypocritical, manner.
Why do people need to *be* empowered?
Not just people, but everything.
Why can they not find the power for themselves?
You mean by retiring to a cave and contemplating power?
That's one way ... it works for some.
For the rest of us it comes down to being empowered by a multitude
of
sources, including analytical ones.
Again, I'm not sure. I'm leery of "being empowered" - that rather smacks of someone/something else *giving* power to another.
I'd prefer a word that meant "taking power" rather than being given power.
It depends on the type of power.
Political, it's *always* a case of taking.
With information (data) that's not necessarily so if someone tells you something you find useful.
FFF Dirk
The Consensus:- The political party for the new millenium http://www.theconsensus.org .
- References:
- Post Modernism
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Post Modernism
- From: janet
- Re: Post Modernism
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Post Modernism
- From: janet
- Post Modernism
- Prev by Date: Re: Post Modernism
- Next by Date: Re: Post Modernism
- Previous by thread: Re: Post Modernism
- Next by thread: Re: Post Modernism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|