They can't see why they are hated



They can't see why they are hated

Americans cannot ignore what their government does abroad

Special report: Terrorism in the US

Seumas Milne

The Guardian, Thursday 13 September 2001 16.31 BST

Nearly two days after the horrific suicide attacks on civilian workers in New York and Washington, it has become painfully clear that most Americans simply don't get it. From the president to passersby on the streets, the message seems to be the same: this is an inexplicable assault on freedom and democracy, which must be answered with overwhelming force - just as soon as someone can construct a credible account of who was actually responsible. Shock, rage and grief there has been aplenty. But any glimmer of recognition of why people might have been driven to carry out such atrocities, sacrificing their own lives in the process - or why the United States is hated with such bitterness, not only in Arab and Muslim countries, but across the developing world - seems almost entirely absent. Perhaps it is too much to hope that, as rescue workers struggle to pull firefighters from the rubble, any but a small minority might make the connection between what has been visited upon them and what their government has visited upon large parts of the world.

But make that connection they must, if such tragedies are not to be repeated, potentially with even more devastating consequences. US political leaders are doing their people no favours by reinforcing popular ignorance with self-referential rhetoric. And the echoing chorus of Tony Blair, whose determination to bind Britain ever closer to US foreign policy ratchets up the threat to our own cities, will only fuel anti-western sentiment. So will calls for the defence of "civilisation", with its overtones of Samuel Huntington's poisonous theories of post-cold war confrontation between the west and Islam, heightening perceptions of racism and hypocrisy.

As Mahatma Gandhi famously remarked when asked his opinion of western civilisation, it would be a good idea. Since George Bush's father inaugurated his new world order a decade ago, the US, supported by its British ally, bestrides the world like a colossus.

Unconstrained by any superpower rival or system of global governance, the US giant has rewritten the global financial and trading system in its own interest; ripped up a string of treaties it finds inconvenient; sent troops to every corner of the globe; bombed Afghanistan, Sudan, Yugoslavia and Iraq without troubling the United Nations; maintained a string of murderous embargos against recalcitrant regimes; and recklessly thrown its weight behind Israel's 34-year illegal military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza as the Palestinian intifada rages.

If, as yesterday's Wall Street Journal insisted, the east coast carnage was the fruit of the Clinton administration's Munich-like appeasement of the Palestinians, the mind boggles as to what US Republicans imagine to be a Churchillian response.

It is this record of unabashed national egotism and arrogance that drives anti-Americanism among swaths of the world's population, for whom there is little democracy in the current distribution of global wealth and power. If it turns out that Tuesday's attacks were the work of Osama bin Laden's supporters, the sense that the Americans are once again reaping a dragons' teeth harvest they themselves sowed will be overwhelming.

It was the Americans, after all, who poured resources into the 1980s war against the Soviet-backed regime in Kabul, at a time when girls could go to school and women to work. Bin Laden and his mojahedin were armed and trained by the CIA and MI6, as Afghanistan was turned into a wasteland and its communist leader Najibullah left hanging from a Kabul lamp post with his genitals stuffed in his mouth.

But by then Bin Laden had turned against his American sponsors, while US-sponsored Pakistani intelligence had spawned the grotesque Taliban now protecting him. To punish its wayward Afghan offspring, the US subsequently forced through a sanctions regime which has helped push 4m to the brink of starvation, according to the latest UN figures, while Afghan refugees fan out across the world.

All this must doubtless seem remote to Americans desperately searching the debris of what is expected to be the largest-ever massacre on US soil - as must the killings of yet more Palestinians in the West Bank yesterday, or even the 2m estimated to have died in Congo's wars since the overthrow of the US-backed Mobutu regime. "What could some political thing have to do with blowing up office buildings during working hours?" one bewildered New Yorker asked yesterday.

Already, the Bush administration is assembling an international coalition for an Israeli-style war against terrorism, as if such counter-productive acts of outrage had an existence separate from the social conditions out of which they arise. But for every "terror network" that is rooted out, another will emerge - until the injustices and inequalities that produce them are addressed.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/sep/13/september11.britainand911

.



Relevant Pages

  • NSA secret database report triggers fierce debate in Washington
    ... WASHINGTON - A massive government database containing the phone ... forces: terrorism and technology. ... administration has always acted within the law and protected Americans' ... Among the controversies over the database, however, is that it was ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • this girl has her head on right
    ... you must be aware that the FedGov has resorted to psychological terrorism to shut the dissenters up. ... I am prepared with survival necessities, but my worry if about those Americans who are not. ... Call an alleged seditionist on the phone (or an activist for Palestinian rights) and they'll swoop down and fly you to New York and place you in front of a grand jury. ... It is like calling a man a child molester and giving the government the authority to prevent him from defending himself effectively against the charges. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Nanny, May I ?
    ... way impacts what I or anyone else has to say for that matter. ... administered somehow by the government and always has been. ... When we Americans created our government, ... indoctrinate kids for 6 hours of everyday? ...
    (alt.smokers.pipes)
  • Will November Bring Hope or Another Stolen Election?
    ... The Bush administration's response to 9/11, ... President Bush and his government into conflict with the US ... Many Americans are unconcerned about these developments, ... war in Iraq was making Americans less safe by breeding more terrorism. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: One-Party Government A Threat To American Liberties--By Paul Craig Roberts
    ... One-Party Government A Threat To American Liberties ... Many Americans are unconcerned about these developments, ... war in Iraq was making Americans less safe by breeding more terrorism. ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)