Re: moderated newsgroups

hermeneutika wrote:
?I for one enjoy being able to access a moderated ng. As i find the
unmoderated ng to be rather difficult and no civilised rules of
behaviour.

Yes. IMO it is not fair to expect the moderators to be perfect. They are
only human, and just as fallible as the rest of us, and will no doubt make
some decisions that each of us will disagree with from time to time. But we
are much better off with them than without.

Tim.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: moderated newsgroups
    ... zayton wrote: ... unmoderated ng to be rather difficult and no civilised rules of ... IMO it is not fair to expect the moderators to be perfect. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: moderated newsgroups
    ... Phil wrote: ... unmoderated ng to be rather difficult and no civilised rules of ... IMO it is not fair to expect the moderators to be perfect. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: moderated newsgroups
    ... unmoderated ng to be rather difficult and no civilised rules of ... IMO it is not fair to expect the moderators to be perfect. ... Phil ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: moderated newsgroups
    ... unmoderated ng to be rather difficult and no civilised rules of ... IMO it is not fair to expect the moderators to be perfect. ... I didn't agree with the way you and Jeff were treated, ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: OT Help needed please
    ... I've only used Google groups in the past when something has gone awol with ... cumbersome way to post and read, IMO. ... newsgroup, the idea being members could discuss matters between themselves ... At it's simplest the moderators just restrict who has access to the group. ...
    (uk.rec.gardening)