Re: Made in the image of God?



On 18 Jan, 10:48, "mark" <no-oneh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
X-No-Archive: yes

nobody wrote:
On 14 Jan, 17:32, "mark" <noadsh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you are serious about discussing evolution you probably are going
to have to go away and research the subject a little more deeply as
your understanding of how you think it works and how it actually
works are a way off of each other
I would say just general knowledge and simple questioning could prove
this theory is flawed….see below

It is not a "theory" in the sense that you are using the word.
However, such as ....?

I know what you mean that it is widely accepted.

But most of my post did not appear through google, another hitch in
the system I guess..


Incidentally, evolution is anything but organised. It's random. And
it relies upon random mutations of genetics and exports into a
natural selection of adaption to environment (amongst other
things...)
exactly that what I am saying…..it what you say in how human developed
is random mutations, but the fact is we are all different races,
different people, different languages, two sexes (not only humans but
all living things on earth are in pairs male and female), we all look
different, we all have different finger prints, etc etc this is not
something random it looks more a more controlled more planned
something evolution isn’t.

It may appear 'designed' to you..... or to some people.
The underlying principle of (random) genetic mutation is a scientific
observation.
You are looking for design and are blinded from the science behind it...


Tell me about the science of the consciousness, or what we call the
soul. Did this also evolve.

The evidence over time is, of course, the existing fossil records
that demonstrate the evolution from ape to hominoid to man.
And the ape exists today, so do monkeys,

But their were various mutations, and if the early forms of mutation
like apes and monkeys exist then why don’t the ones that came after?

:0)
The answer is because you are not understanding what, or how, evolution
works.
The nine tenths of species that have ever been on this planet that are now
extinct are so because they could not survive in that form and their
'ancestors' who mutated into more adapted species (..this could be three or
four generations to thousands of generations by the way) survived.

That is an assumption, when we even today may have not discovered all
species alive today on the planet, then you go and tell us about
something that you say went extinct thousands if not millions of years
ago.

Those
that did not mutate, perished. Hence the enormous amount of now dead
species.
Look, since the fifties and even more recently, genetic discovery has
confirmed ancestory from DNA modules. There is precious little guessing
going on anymore.
The weight of evidence is overwhelmingly on the side of evolution as the
explanation of how mankind is here.
I might suggest to you, respectfully, that you portray all the
characteristics of fundamentalistic, evangelical (US) christians that
question established science over and over and over again in an attempt to
fit the world to the holy book.
I'm ever amazed at the offhand acceptance of what science has done and how,
in every aspect of modern life, we live with the results of scientific
discovery. No problem with that.... we're even using it to converse here.



Relevant Pages