Re: The Rebellious Son
- From: loiner2003 <loiner2003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:51:52 +0000
Gareth McCaughan wrote:
Kendall K Down wrote:
A little while ago Gareth and I had a discussion which centred, at least in part, on the Biblical stipulations regarding the rebellious son. Gareth appeared to find it incredible that any parent would be willing to take his child before the courts and in that regard I was interested to come across the following news item the other day.
I went back and read that thread. It's quite long, so I may
have missed bits, but I have to say that it doesn't appear
to match your description here even slightly.
I shouldn't think that surprises you!
--
Revd. Eric Potts
"I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able
to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Rebellious Son
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: The Rebellious Son
- References:
- The Rebellious Son
- From: Kendall K Down
- Re: The Rebellious Son
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- The Rebellious Son
- Prev by Date: Re: "Anglican leader urges ban on gay bishops" - Associated Press
- Next by Date: Oh brave new world!
- Previous by thread: Re: The Rebellious Son
- Next by thread: Re: The Rebellious Son
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|