Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders



Phil Saunders wrote:

"PG" <pgk9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:480b5d4d$0$903$ba4acef3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Michael J Davis" <?.?@trustsof.demon.co.uk> a écrit dans le message de
news: QbcNJmFlc1CIFwZs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In message <MPG.2270a8167703a2f98978d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Higgins
<tom.higgins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Peter Ashby takes the idea of fuzziness to the point of not wanting
to declare that anyone is a human being. He doesn't want to draw any
lines. /Some/ amount of fuzziness can be acceptable. But so far as
he has explained his position I would guess that if there was a
single human sperm 10 feet away from an unfertilized human egg, he
would declare that it was fuzzy whether it should count as a human
being or not. That would not be reasonable. I also do not think it
would be reasonable of him to deny that /he/ was a human being. So
lines /can/ be drawn. A retreat behind a position of "it's all
fuzzy" goes nowhere.

It's also so unscientific, isn't it?

What imho would be especially unscientific would be to draw lines without
sufficient evidence to theorise that there are lines in the first place.

pga

Anyone who says that "x is not human" or fully human or truly human or
whatever has already drawn a line somewhere.

This is just not true.

I say that a separated sperm-plus-egg don't constitute a human being,
even if it happens that they're going to end up together. But I deny
that there is any clear dividing *line* between not-a-human-being
and a-human-being. Of course I could be wrong, but I assure you
that to the best of my knowledge I really truly don't believe that
there is any such dividing line.

If they refuse to admit that the line exists then either they are self
decieved or are being deceitful.

I suppose that means that you claim I am either lying or deceiving
myself. Of course I can't possibly prove that you're wrong, so
suffice it to say that (1) I see absolutely no evidence that you're
right and (2) I don't think it unreasonable to suppose that I'm
better acquainted with my mind than you are.

All this talk of fuzziness is a smokescreen in order to avoid saying
something concrete that can be seen to be as arbitray as that which the
poster does not agree with imho.

I don't think an opinion that leads you to claim you know my mind
better than I do is "humble", so I suggest that you consider saying
"imao" rather than "imho".

--
Gareth McCaughan
..sig under construc
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders
    ... to declare that anyone is a human being. ... What imho would be especially unscientific would be to draw lines without ... I appear to be better acquainted with reason than you on this. ... care whether you think I'm humble or not nor do I care for your suggestion. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: FoA next wek
    ... plenty of sets just in case anyone changes their mind and wants to use them. ... for those they play with, hence my surprise that nothing had happened yet. ... Chris and I don't want to play together, so perhaps the draw could be random ... Tee times as said before, ...
    (uk.sport.golf)
  • Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders
    ... to declare that anyone is a human being. ... What imho would be especially unscientific would be to draw lines without ... whatever has already drawn a line somewhere. ... All this talk of fuzziness is a smokescreen in order to avoid saying ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: low-limit
    ... I paired deuces and went all in. ... I won the low half of a high-low declare five card draw hand with ... betting or raising but the three three-card draws started raising each ... other after the draw, so I took "plan B" and half the pot. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: who does Salahuddin evolve so in part, whenever Steve stems the musical football very entirely
    ... Cathy, have a double draw. ... You won't reassure it. ... Will you mind concerning the covenant, if Ella thereafter coulds the complexity? ...
    (sci.crypt)