Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders

On 2008-03-30, loiner2003 <loiner2003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm just getting into "The Blind Watchmaker." Dawkins does an excellent
job of explaining the process of evolutionary development and I find
very helpful his analysis of the innumerable small stages in development
and, indeed, of the particle not blending method of taking genetic
material from parents. (How slow we were at understanding the
significance of Mendel!) It seems clear that in the whole process of
development there are in fact no clear boundary lines between one stage
and the next. If at some stage we want to say X is human whereas X minus
N (where N is the previous minute alteration) is not, then we are
imposing a human philosophy on a process for our own better
understanding (perhaps!) But there is no physical line and any
philosophical line has to be very carefully argued and justified. It
cannot be imposed.


If you consider everything as continual processes then you end up
considering us without beginning or end. It's an interesting idea.

The things that make us what/who we are obviously stretch well before
our conception, and our effects on our world will last after we die.

- Richard

--
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard Corfield <Richard.Corfield@xxxxxxxxx>
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ Time is a one way street,
_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ except in the Twilight Zone
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders
    ... job of explaining the process of evolutionary development and I find ... imposing a human philosophy on a process for our own better ... understanding But there is no physical line and any ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders
    ... Dawkins does an excellent job of explaining the process of evolutionary development and I find very helpful his analysis of the innumerable small stages in development and, indeed, of the particle not blending method of taking genetic material from parents. ... If at some stage we want to say X is human whereas X minus N is not, then we are imposing a human philosophy on a process for our own better understanding But there is no physical line and any philosophical line has to be very carefully argued and justified. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Property of photon.
    ... Perhaps you and I have a different understanding of what Planck's basic ... Why don't you start by explaining what your ... With my poor English it is not easy to explain something like that. ... a discussion in English about physics with you is going ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Property of photon.
    ... Perhaps you and I have a different understanding of what Planck's basic ... Why don't you start by explaining what your ... With my poor English it is not easy to explain something like that. ... Why, Henry, I've seen you write long, numbered missives about falling ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Property of photon.
    ... Perhaps you and I have a different understanding of what Planck's basic ... Why don't you start by explaining what your ... With my poor English it is not easy to explain something like that. ... Why, Henry, I've seen you write long, numbered missives about falling ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)