Re: The wicked untruths of our church leaders

"David Aldred" <nr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
bbb4c5xc1f.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PG wrote:

(1) One final point, on a slight tangent - if a human donor egg, for
whatever reason, is never going to develop into a human being (age of
donor, infirmity/major threat to health from childbirth, no wish to have
children/any more children, whatever) - precisely what is the objection
to
its use for research?

If it's an egg (so unfertilised), there's no problem. Once it's a
conceived
human life, it's sacred.

I wouldn't go as far as using the term 'sacred', but I do sympathise with
your views, once the egg is fertilised.

(Hmm. This time the '>>>'s have kicked in properly. Very strange).

pga
.