Re: Missing Links
- From: "Kendall K. Down" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:52:48 GMT
In message <1id0rkq.zgk4br14el4zzN%pashby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
pashby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Ashby) wrote:
This is for Kendall who recently stated point blank that there are no
animals or fossils who link disparate forms. He is also wont to use New
Scientist articles for twisted purposes. So Ken, since you esteem NS so
highly, this week on pages 39 and 41 are 10 very good examples. I think
No1 is the best, though the series on the fish-amphibian transition is
very good with tiktaalik filling a previous gap.
I haven't bought it yet. I'll get back to you when I have.
God bless,
Kendall K. Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.
- References:
- Missing Links
- From: Peter Ashby
- Missing Links
- Prev by Date: Re: How do kids do Christianity anyway?
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution means people weren't planned.
- Previous by thread: Re: Missing Links
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
