Re: Unlawful Bearing the sword and violence [was Teddy bears and prophets]

"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC"
<broadband[remove]1234@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7ns9j.10113$745.10055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tSr9j.10422$h35.1753@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC"
<broadband[remove]1234@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hHh9j.11651$ov2.4491@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wNc9j.11424$ov2.4162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC"
<broadband[remove]1234@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2P89j.7331$745.6298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
That you are arguing with your own position is amusing.

Not at all Phil, as my answers prove.

Exactly so Jeff. He said "not all killing is wrong". You agree with
that.

ROFL....Of course....."not all killing is wrong"
I've done quite a bit of it myself over the years.....{;o;}

see I was right, again.

It appears so until the we actually start "Rightly dividing the Word of
Truth".
Christ obviously did not include insects, animals, fishes, etc.

Jeff...

Not really Jeff, I suggest that you read this quite slowly.

The poster said that we can conclude from the OT and the new that not all
killing is wrong. He was refering to killing of people.

That point of view is one which you hold. You may disagree about
what/where/who the exceptions are and you may have personal/biblical/other
reasons for thinking that is the case.

Either way you agree with the poster.

That you would rather argue the case than accept a simple truth is bizarre
but not unsurprising.

Phil
.

Relevant Pages