Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- From: celia <c_a_blay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:33:43 -0700
On 18 Aug, 16:55, "Phil Saunders" <philip.saund...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
OE dunnitOutlook Express or Old English ?
The OE is 'scitan' sc = modern sh.
Amazing where local history studies will take you.
I discovered in an A/ S charter what must be one of the oldest uses of
the word 'faeces' rather satisfying to discover that it had been
missed by the Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology.
Celia
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- From: Adam Funk
- Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- References:
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: celia
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Andrew McMullon
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Andrew McMullon
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Phil Saunders
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Alec Brady
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Andrew McMullon
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- From: Phil Saunders
- Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- From: 1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC
- Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- From: Andrew McMullon
- Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- From: Phil Saunders
- Re: With total respect...Faith & Works.
- Prev by Date: Re: with total respect.....
- Next by Date: Re: Faithful Christian Women & the Priesthood [was The Protestant church is NOT worthy of the name "church"]
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- Next by thread: Re: Poor! Christian Language Standards Once Again?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|