Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- From: "Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:11:25 GMT
"Quasin" <quasin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:468F2F92.70700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kendall K. Down wrote:
In message <ekk7o2tsu6ak4fj2ipllt9i2sv1iqkqkdu@xxxxxxx>
Nick Milton <nickspamtrap_milton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In which case, it is now down to you to argue that homosexual lust is
improper
For a Bible-believing Christian, that is more or less a "given".
You might go to jail for saying what you think?
"Homophobia is a criminal offence in Belgium since the passage of the
Anti-Discrimination Act of 2003."
"Christian Vanneste, a member of the French parliament, was convicted for
homophobia by a French court for saying that 'heterosexuality is morally
superior to homosexuality'"
http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=24628
It was a stupid thing to say and it isnt true.
Moral superiority relies on context. My friend sleeping with a women he
picked up in a disco is the moral equivalent of him doing the same with a
man.
regards
Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- From: Gordon Hudson
- Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- References:
- Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- From: Quasin
- Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- Prev by Date: Re: Do you believe in grace Jeff? Yes! but it has it's conditions!
- Next by Date: Re: Jonathan Edwards - How come you're not discussing him?
- Previous by thread: Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- Next by thread: Re: Christianity and civil partnership
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|