Re: Evangelical's Role in non sinful Slavery

In article <spRiVtCCS2GGFw1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael J Davis wrote:
In message <460b5d8b$0$25945$ba4acef3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pg
<ngs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC"
<broadband[remove]1234@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
|
| I don't know Robert.
| My posts have been defending the Christian owning of slaves, as
approved of
| by NT Scripture.

[snip]

Personally I think there is little more insulting than some of the
comments we regularly see here about the subjugation of women and
slaves, and it is a sad indictment of this forum that it is not capable
of calling a spade a spade and roundly and regularly condemning the
despicable nonsense certain fundamentalists persist in pressing through
their regular contributions.

eh? Who is supporting Jeff in this? Indeed who is not condemning him. Is
he not condemned by his own keyboard?

It also demonstrates to an extent the point that Dawkins and others have
made - that 'moderate' religion is not only the perfect breeding ground
for this type of view, but that the moderates themselves are either
incapable of or unwilling to deal with it.

Rubbish. What do you want? A lynch mob?

Tell me - how many atheists were anti-slavery 200 years ago?

How many atheists were there 200 years ago?

One abolitionist atheist was Erasmus Darwin, admittedly he had already
died 200 years ago.

I agree that no one here seems to be supporting Jeff.

--
\----
|\* | Emma Pease Net Spinster
|_\/ Die Luft der Freiheit weht
.