Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: Nick Milton <nickspamtrap_milton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:04:23 +0100
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:57:21 +0100, "Kendall K. Down"
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <1157985386.244236.82070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Revd. Eric Potts" <loiner2003@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It's in two different languages, btw, which rather tells against the
one author hypothesis. (Chapters 1 and 8 to the end in Hebrew and
Chapters 2-7 in Aramaic in the same manuscripts.)
Good gracious! I didn't realise that documentary criticism was so easy.
Let's see: I've got a copy of the Decameron in which one chapter is in
Italian (or it might be Latin), so now I know that Boccaccio was a figment
of our imagination and really the whole thing was written by several
authors. Based on this simple test I postulate at least two P.G. Wodehouses
(Wodehice?), half a dozen Agatha Christies and I've lost count of the number
of Gibbonses.
There's only one Ken Down - the standard of argument and logic is
consistent throughout
.
- References:
- Re: 7 Days
- From: marcandmia
- Re: 7 Days
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: 7 Days
- From: marcandmia
- Re: 7 Days
- From: Nick Milton
- Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: marcandmia
- Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: Nick Milton
- Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: marcandmia
- Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: Revd. Eric Potts
- Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: 7 Days
- Prev by Date: Re: Honest question about church attitude to gay relationships
- Next by Date: Re: Honest question about church attitude to gay relationships
- Previous by thread: Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- Next by thread: Re: 7 Days - Documentary Hypothesis flawed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|