Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: "Kendall K. Down" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:57:34 GMT
In message <1152822656.185321.157190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Revd. Eric Potts" <loiner2003@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Because if conservatives find it difficult to distinguish between a
liberal theist and an atheist, then that suggests there is something
seriously wrong with the reasoning facilities of conservatives.
Actually, Mark is incorrect. It is easy to tell the difference between an
atheist and a liberal: a liberal is an atheist who claims to believe in God.
God bless,
Kendall K. Down
P.S. My tongue is very firmly lodged in a lateral position.
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.
- References:
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Peter R
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Peter R
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Simon Robinson
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Peter R
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Simon Robinson
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Mark Goodge
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Peter R
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- From: Revd. Eric Potts
- Re: Adultery and Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: Adultery and Sin
- Next by Date: Re: Adultery and Sin
- Previous by thread: Re: Adultery and Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Adultery and Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|