Re: Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- From: "Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:35:34 GMT
"Richard Dudley" <abraxalito@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149032752.496374.92090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kendall K. Down wrote:
However, young people are poorly served by deliberate attempts to
withhold, distort or misrepresent scientific knowledge and
understanding in
order to promote particular religious beliefs.
I certainly agree with this. Truth, including Creationism, does not need
to
fear exposure to facts.
So do you have any inkling of why Steve Jones' experience with
Creationists turned out the way it did in this article ?
http://books.guardian.co.uk/hay2006/story/0,,1785655,00.html
I dont know.
Thats his theory stuffed isnt it.
Phil
.
- References:
- Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- From: Bob Todd
- Re: Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- From: Richard Dudley
- Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- Prev by Date: Re: uk.r.c thread summary (30 May)
- Next by Date: Re: Conflicts, contrasts or differences between Catholics and Protestants in Great Britain
- Previous by thread: Re: Royal Society Statement on evolution and ID
- Next by thread: Question for Nick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
