Re: Out-dated theory

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:16:49 GMT, "Kendall K. Down"
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <2j7b02lp313tn43t5t5gtbn4t69g5p3rg8@xxxxxxx>
William <tielige@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Oh I've heard of them. Along with natural selection, it is the
mechanism identified for evolutionary change. I thought creationists
had a different one. I'm surprised.

Oh, Creationists believe in mutations and also in natural selection. We just
deny that it has the power to turn dogs into dolphins;

Is there evolutionary evidence that dogs have turned into dolphins? If
not then evolution has not said that it has occurred.

But you deny that mutations and natural selection has the power to do
it. Please present your argument to support such a denial.

but it's quite sufficient for white moths into black ones and back again.

I didn't know it had actually changed the colour of any moth. I
thought it only effected the offspring. You have greater faith in
evolution than I have.

And if it can change the colour then please explain what prevents it
from changing the morphology, size and other characteristics. And if
such changes in characteristics developed (through further mutation
and natural selection) in a population please explain what would
prevent these moths from surviving but eventually being unable to
breed with those isolated from that population. No bald assertions
please, an explanation is required.

William
.

Relevant Pages