Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: Gareth McCaughan <Gareth.McCaughan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Dec 2005 16:24:02 +0000
Nick Milton wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2005 21:50:03 +0000, Gareth McCaughan
> <Gareth.McCaughan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> marcandmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>> The following article was written by Dr John C Walton in response to an
>>> article by Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne which was published in the
>>> Guardian on 1 September 2005. Dr Walton's response was sent to the
>>> Guardian on Tuesday 20 December 2005.
>>
>> What twaddle.
>
> Well said gareth, and well done for having the patience to address
> such lengthy and pernicious material
Thanks. In fairness, despite appearances above, I didn't say
that *everything* Prof Walton said was twaddle; only some of it.
Some other bits were merely wrong, there were occasional flashes
of near-correctness, and I think one or two things he said were
actually true.
--
Gareth McCaughan
..sig under construc
.
- References:
- SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: marcandmia
- Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: Nick Milton
- SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Prev by Date: Re: Why do the Mormons bother with this newsgroup?
- Next by Date: Re: Why do the Mormons bother with this newsgroup?
- Previous by thread: Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Next by thread: Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|