Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Dec 2005 02:53:58 -0800
fergus wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2005 21:50:03 +0000, Gareth McCaughan
> <Gareth.McCaughan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >"Intelligent Design" is not a fresh, enlightening breeze.
> >It is a reappearance of William Paley's arguments from
> >the 18th century in lightly updated dress.
> I haven't read the books which you describe as deceptive etc. but have
> read Behes' "Darwin's black box" which seems to make a large number of
> very valid points. Do you consider this book to have the same ethical
> failings as Johnson, Dembski and the others?
On Hank Hanegraaf's radio show, I asked Behe if he believed there was
good evidence that Homo sapiens had descended from creatures that were
not Homo sapiens.
Behe replied that he did believe there was good evidence.
Hanegraaf was very annoyed by Behe's answer.
.
- References:
- SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: marcandmia
- Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- From: fergus
- SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Prev by Date: Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Next by Date: Re: Why do the Mormons bother with this newsgroup?
- Previous by thread: Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Next by thread: Re: SDA scientist responds to Dawkins article in the Guardian about ID
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|