Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Nick Milton <nickspamtrap_milton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:55:37 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 09:09:12 GMT, "Kendall K. Down"
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sure, if Harrison's right then some things currently
>> believed about the "evolution" of the earth into its
>> present state will need changing.
>
>Good - and those changes will bring the theory a tiny step closer to the
>Biblical scenario.
In many (or indeed probably most) cases, it does the exact opposite.
As more data become available, the case of Young Earth Creationism
becomes vanishingly weak
.
- References:
- Hades - or Eden?
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Hades - or Eden?
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Hades - or Eden?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hades - or Eden?
- Next by Date: Re: my open university course
- Previous by thread: Re: Hades - or Eden?
- Next by thread: Re: Hades - or Eden?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|