Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: "Kendall K. Down" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:07:11 +0100
In message <5esqd15d4ib1ulos1jccccpesn1bcm9lvm@xxxxxxx>
William <tielige@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you think you have a scientific theory of Creationism then please
> present it.
First of all, I'm not a scientist, so you're asking the wrong person.
Secondly, I think you should define what you are looking for, otherwise
we'll be in the business of someone presenting a theory and you saying "Ah,
but that's not scientific".
God bless,
Kendall K. Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premiere archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: William
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- References:
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: Mark Goodge
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: William
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: Kendall K. Down
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- From: William
- Re: ID rears its ugly head
- Prev by Date: Re: ID rears its ugly head
- Next by Date: Re: ID rears its ugly head
- Previous by thread: Re: ID rears its ugly head
- Next by thread: Re: ID rears its ugly head
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
