Re: A new mountain
- From: "Paul Saunders" <pvs1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:06:54 +0100
T Dave R wrote:
Does anyone though know why they think they can be so accurate with
the height? Presumably because they took 7,000 readings?
I believe it's called "averaging". You can do the same with a normal GPS,
but I rarely bother with more than 50 readings, which takes about a minute.
Of course, they were using better equipment than a typical walkers' GPS.
Paul
--
http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A new mountain
- From: galltywenallt
- Re: A new mountain
- References:
- A new mountain
- From: Tom Crispin
- Re: A new mountain
- From: Simon Challands
- Re: A new mountain
- From: T Dave R
- A new mountain
- Prev by Date: Re: Beginning bagging
- Next by Date: Re: how far is the horizon and OT photography
- Previous by thread: Re: A new mountain
- Next by thread: Re: A new mountain
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|