Re: Victory for green lanes



The message <68agqfF2sfq3lU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
from Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> contains these words:

Roger wrote:

Turning the majority of motorists into common criminals doesn't help the
situation particularly when what has been perfectly legal for years gets
criminalised for no better reason than a non driving socialist not
wanting the rich to drive any faster than the volk in their volkswagons.

Oh dear. The rant-o-meter has just broken having gone off the scale,
leading me to suspect some angry rationalisation has taken the place of
informed thought.

What's the matter Pete? Got out of bed the wrong side today?

Barbara Castle was a Stalinist of the old school resentful of anything
that was not distributed equally be it wealth, intelligence or fast
cars. She never even learned to drive which further prejudiced her
against motorists. The arbitrary 70 mph limit had no justification other
than it was the top speed of the VW Beetle which had been widely
advertised as being capable of being driven flat out all day, unlike
many of its contemporaries. Hardly surprising when the 1200 cc Beetle
engine put out only a pitiful 34 bhp at maximum, the same as a 848 cc
Mini and 5 bhp down on a 997 cc 105E Ford Anglia which could also be
driven flat out all day.

Today's motorists, should they venture onto roads where the national
speed limit has no relevance, or travel on the better roads when they
are obliged by adverse conditions to limit their speed to below the
posted limits are still expected to exercise their judgement and road
reading skills. Is it really so extreme to expect those same drivers to
be similarly responsible if given the chance on the better roads when
the conditions are less testing?

The number of deaths on British roads has been on a downward curve since
before the advent of the socialist curse and that despite the huge
increase in traffic and the higher speeds today.

Transport research has long noted a "safety in numbers" effect. The
more cars/bikes/whatever there are, the lower the accident rates. If
people are more used to other vehicles, they pay more attention to them.
Perhaps counter-intuitive, but true, and neatly sidesteps you rant
about the evils of socialism.

Ah yes, that would be why road casualties soared as the amount of motor
traffic on the roads increased in the first half of the 20th century.
Personally I put the change from ever increasing casualties to long term
decline to the post war road building program which didn't really take
off until the late 50s, the introduction of the MOT test (1960 I think)
and the continual improvement of modern vehicles.

Meanwhile deaths from hospital acquired infections didn't even register
on the public radar until the total exceeded that on the roads. Are we
to see hospital staff penalised for failures in hygiene?

Do you honestly believe they aren't?

Motorists who are convicted of causing death by dangerous driving
generally end up in jail with a criminal record. I haven't heard
anything that leads me to believe that anyone in the NHS has acquired a
criminal record because of hospital acquired infection deaths, let along
bgeen sent to jail.

You won't get drivers acting as responsible adults by treating them like
irresponsible infants.

But as the record shows, you won't get them them acting responsibly by
assuming they'll sensibly limit themselves.

See above. There is ample evidence that by and large motorists do limit
their speed when circumstances demand it. Extending the scope would give
said motorists more opportunity to practice roadcraft and as everyone
knows, practice makes perfect. :-)

--
Roger Chapman
Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
89 miles as the crow flies,
considerably more as the walker drives.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
    ... showed clearly that accident risk rises the faster a driver travels: ... greater separation or stricter segregation to allow safer higher speeds, ... that only the speeding drivers are injured, which we know for a fact ... safe roads without the need for uncommon skills, ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Spindrift doesnt understand the issue
    ... Smith and Safespeed need to realise that the vast majority of drivers ... Motorways and trunk roads with grade-separated junctions are ... brightly lit just like roads for cars are now. ... average speeds would prevent more than 200 deaths and 3,500 serious ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Spindrift doesnt understand the issue
    ... Smith and Safespeed need to realise that the vast majority of drivers ... Motorways and trunk roads with grade-separated junctions are ... for cars are now. ... average speeds would prevent more than 200 deaths and 3,500 serious ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
    ... Collisions aren't more frequent on quiet roads at night when speeds are higher, ... conclude that this risk applies only to the speeding motorist would ... Perhaps the highway authorities should be held to account, not only for maintenance deficiencies, but also for design deficiencies result in motorists being mislead into driving at inappropriate speeds. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Are our police blind?
    ... Or are you just talking about the roads that you speed on, ... That's very different to having a vehicle incapable of maintaining the ... If other drivers hadn't wanted to go faster, ... speeds higher than the number onna stick. ...
    (uk.rec.driving)

Quantcast