Re: Four in a row"
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:04:53 +0100
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:40:37 +0100, Mike Clark <mrc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <6tice2ldu46n9c6pk2rpcln7bn08k63efr@xxxxxxx>
amacmil304@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:51:09 GMT, usenet@xxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Webb)
wrote:
Such abuses are self inflicted and not accidents.
So something could be done?
They say not. It has to come from within.
Complete nonsense!
Not in the slightest.
You could erect fences around all supplies of food and only let people
eat by rationing their allowance. You could ban alcohol. Such measures
would undoubtedly reduce the incidence of deaths caused by obesity and
alcohol.
On the other hand they would be very unpopular, people would see it as
a reduction in their quality of life.
These are not accidental deaths.
A bit like forcing people to turn wild areas into theme parks by fencing
in all the paths.
No comparison.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: Mike Clark
- Re: Four in a row"
- References:
- Four in a row"
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: Stuart
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: Richard Webb
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Four in a row"
- From: Mike Clark
- Four in a row"
- Prev by Date: Re: Four in a row"
- Next by Date: Re: Four in a row"
- Previous by thread: Re: Four in a row"
- Next by thread: Re: Four in a row"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
