Re: Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- From: Mike P <mike@askme>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:38:36 +0100
On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:56:16 +0100, Simon Caldwell
<simonjcaldwell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... >On 6 May 2006 02:14:28 -0700, "Bedspring" <bedmobile1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
... >wrote:
... >>
... >>You can go with an ice axe but no crampons, but you should not take
... >>crampons and no ice axe because GENERALLY crampons can get you into
... >>trouble and the ice axe can get you out of trouble.
... >
... >On the contrary, an axe might (or might not) stop you if you fall, but
... >crampons keep you out of trouble by stopping you falling in the first
... >place.
... >
..
You obviously have never stuck a 12 point crampon into the opposite
leg's gaitor by accident then ?
Mike P
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- From: Simon Caldwell
- Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- References:
- Ice axe *or* crampons?
- From: still_the_same_me
- Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- From: Bedspring
- Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- From: Simon Caldwell
- Ice axe *or* crampons?
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for URW expedition 20
- Next by Date: Re: Proposal for URW expedition 20
- Previous by thread: Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- Next by thread: Re: Ice axe *or* crampons?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|