Re: hotels in fort william
- From: Tim Jackson <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:12:33 -0000
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:29:23 +0000, Judith wrote...
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:21:43 -0000, Tim Jackson
> <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >The best exercise of all would be to get the students to join in
> >conversations about things that they are genuinely interested in, rather
> >than thinking up a fake question purely as an exercise. That may or may
> >not be something walking-related, depending on the student's interests,
> >and consequently it may or may not be posted in this newsgroup or some
> >other group.
>
> I agree, but they probably only have 40 minutes in which to "do"
> "chatrooms" (sic) so can't stick around for an answer on a subject
> which interests them.
So what we are criticising here is the design of the course. As we have
done on many previous occasions.
--
Tim Jackson
news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Change '.invalid' to '.com' to reply direct)
Absurd patents: visit http://www.patent.freeserve.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: Judith
- Re: hotels in fort william
- References:
- hotels in fort william
- From: dannyorwell
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: SteveO
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: dannyorwell
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: SteveO
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: Judith
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: Tim Jackson
- Re: hotels in fort william
- From: Judith
- hotels in fort william
- Prev by Date: Re: Basic navigational skills badly missing
- Next by Date: Re: hotels in fort william
- Previous by thread: Re: hotels in fort william
- Next by thread: Re: hotels in fort william
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|