Re: PING PW
- From: Peewiglet <pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:32:56 +0100
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:31:28 +0100, Judith
<no.spam.for.goofif.please@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:28:27 +0100, Peewiglet <pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> UMRA?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A wild guess: uk.media.radio.archers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Brill! You're a dab hand at this game. I haddocklue
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Aaaghh!
>>>>>>
>>>>>><fx: drops to the floor in dead faint>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That was *terrible*!
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks. Let minnow if you want any more.
>>>>
>>>>Stop now... you're making me eel....
>>>
>>>We all have dace like that.
>>
>><fx: PW dabs forehead with wet hanky>
>>
>>I'll give you sick squid if you'll stop!
>
>I'll mullet over.
Thank goodness... or I may have to call a sturgeon!
Wet fishes,
--
,,
(**)PeeWiglet~~
/ \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk
"It's no exaggeration to say the undecideds could go one way or another."
g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING PW
- From: Judith
- Re: PING PW
- References:
- Re: PING PW
- From: MalJ
- Re: PING PW
- From: Peewiglet
- Re: PING PW
- From: Mike Thompson
- Re: PING PW
- From: Judith
- Re: PING PW
- From: Peewiglet
- Re: PING PW
- From: Judith
- Re: PING PW
- From: Peewiglet
- Re: PING PW
- From: Peewiglet
- Re: PING PW
- From: Judith
- Re: PING PW
- Prev by Date: Re: PING PW
- Next by Date: Re: PING PW
- Previous by thread: Re: PING PW
- Next by thread: Re: PING PW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|