Re: New Lancashire 20s-30s walking group

The message <wC1Re.2668$w4.990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
from John Haworth <john.haworth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> contains these words:

> > Well I suppose it is less exclusive than wanting to walk alone. They do
> > actually say "Anyone is welcome to attend our walks" which gives a
> > confused message to say the least. I did toy with the idea of turning up
> > on a walk as East Lancs is not so far from West Yorks but I thought it
> > might be embarrassing.
> >

> You are very welcome to come along, we won't be asking for ID :) If you
> are well over 40 though, I would have thought the existing local groups
> would be more suitable.

I've been 41 for the last 20 years, as you would have known had you been
reading the ng for any length of time. :-)

--
Roger Chapman so far this year 53 summits
New - 27 (Marilyns 13, Nuttalls 5, Outlying Fells 10)
Repeats - 26 (Marilyns 10, Nuttalls 17, Wainwrights 12, Outlying Fells 0)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Lancashire 20s-30s walking group
    ... >> Who wants to walk with only their own age group? ... >Well I suppose it is less exclusive than wanting to walk alone. ... "I don't walk fast, really I don't" nonsense!) ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: New Lancashire 20s-30s walking group
    ... >>Well I suppose it is less exclusive than wanting to walk alone. ... >>confused message to say the least. ... I did toy with the idea of turning up ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: New Lancashire 20s-30s walking group
    ... Roger wrote: ... Well I suppose it is less exclusive than wanting to walk alone. ... John ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: New Lancashire 20s-30s walking group
    ... >> Well I suppose it is less exclusive than wanting to walk alone. ... >> confused message to say the least. ... *Splutter* You don't know young Roger, ...
    (uk.rec.walking)