Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- From: Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:36:41 +0100
On or around Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:02:21 +0100, Guy King
<guy.king@xxxxxxxxxxxx> enlightened us thusly:
The message <MPG.2174b0beb347956e98d769@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
from Sena <"\"#\""@cymoeddorguk.privacy.net> contains these words:
Time to read the constitution carefully and, if appropriate, holdAbsolutely not! The aim is to get the business over and done with ASAP,
them to it.
not to go on all night!
Oh, right.
I believe technically the AGM is for the purpose of appointing officers and
committee, and dealing with any matters arising from previous AGMs, not for
everyday business at all. But most organisations combine it with a more
mundane sort of meeting. In my eyes, there should be scope for any ordinary
bod to get up and say "I think this needs doing". It might not be decided
or even discussed much at the time, but there should be scope for it.
It would be reasonable to require such things to be submitted in advance of
the meeting in order to allow time for them, but it's not reasonable for the
committee or executive to rule that the matter can't be raised. They can
rule that it shall be raised and appoint a subcommitee or officers or other
people to investigate or deal with whatever is raised. But it should be
raised in the meeting and minuted, otherwise, how does ordinary joe member
get to raise anything at all?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
.
- References:
- Firejbexf Moot?
- From: malc
- Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- From: malc
- Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- From: Guy King
- Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- From: Guy King
- Firejbexf Moot?
- Prev by Date: Re: Unhinged
- Next by Date: Re: sheddi sunday
- Previous by thread: Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- Next by thread: Re: Firejbexf Moot?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|