Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson <richardR@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Sep 2007 10:17:50 GMT
Countess-Palatine Blackberry the Perplexed of Divine Intervention said:
On 11 Sep 2007 00:00:30 GMT, Richard Robinson <richardR@xxxxxxxxxxx>
It's all down to statistics, I'm afraid but I think they're pretty sure...
Which is not to say it can't be harmful. Or that it is. I just don't see
how much of any of this takes me towards knowing. And the only answer
would be to chase the metastudies, go to the sources and read them for
myself. Does any of this increase our knowledge ? But it increases the
number of people who've "heard" there might be this and that wrong with
that cannabis hfr in adolescence may, in some cases, lead to mental
ilnesses, of which schizophrenia is one. As schizophrenia sometimes
runs in families, that means that a child may have predispositions to it
which cannabis use may activate and they may become ill where they might
have escaped, or the become ill earlier and worse than they might have.
done.
But this is exactly what I'm questioning. Smoking dope leads to mental
illness, schizophrenia is a mental illness, therefore smoking dope leads to
schizophrenia.
The common cold virus makes people less healthy, athlete's foot is a form of
ill-health, therefore the cold virus gives you Fungus.
See what I mean ? It's only true if "the common-cold" and "athlete's foot"
are different words for the same thing, if they can't be told apart from
each other. Otherwise it just doesn't follow. [1]
At which point, yes, it's down to statistics. Exactly what sort of problems
is there evidence for ? But, details, not big wide concepts that include all
kinds of things way beyond anything anyone claims to have seen happening; or
we end up with lots of people thinking there's evidence they should be
worrying, in cases where there isn't. Which could only be sorted out, in
individual cases, by chasing the reports of the evidence, looking at the
technical words for the symptoms they think it might be linked with, and
then trying to work out how well those words match with the techy terms of
whatever diagnosis has been given for that individual.
Er, no, I dasagree with myself. "Statistics" would be about how much you
trust the conclusions from the evidence, which is a separate question. It's
just Basic Pedantry, paying attention to the meanings of the words.
The complete change in his personality is not, I think, totally
explained by adolescence, and that change seems to have led to his
terrible depression and anxiety. I thought his anxiety was a lot
better, but when the police had occasion to visit me recently and he was
alone in the house, it threw him completely and took several days for
him to get over it. He used to be so happy-go-lucky and enjoyed life so
much, that it's very sad to see him in this state.
It must be horrible, yes, and I are very sorry that you all have to deal
with it, it's a shame.
[1] Logicians have spent hundreds of years picking this one apart, and given
it various Bad Names, which I can't find any snappy ones for just now (2
minutes with Wikipedia suggests that The Middle Term Is Undistributed. Er, I
think I'll back out of that one. "Syllogism" was the search term I started
with). Basic point is, it's well-known to be not a helpful way to think
because it just doesn't lead to conclusions that can be trusted.
--
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem
My email address is at http://www.qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html
.
- References:
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Roger Hunt
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: JonG
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: JonG
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- Prev by Date: Re: But what about yer cojjers ?
- Next by Date: Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- Previous by thread: Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- Next by thread: Re: Rejection (seen elsewhere) Now with link
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|