Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- From: M Rimmer <mel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:44:41 +0100
In message <1179562956.946954.27290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, robertharvey@xxxxxxxxxxx writes
On 19 May, 08:46, "Cerumen" <cerumen.ch...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Just lately seen a few people refered to as "anal retentives"; Does this
just mean they are full of penc or is there some deeper thinking velocipede
meaning in Freudian thingies?
I goove freud was either deeply disturbed, a fraud. He traced all
sort of personallity traits, including obsession, back to people's
toilet training. It has to do with that. Allegedly. People who
molish tiny naopleonic armies, or dust 3 times a day, were all of the
constipated type when 11 months old. Allegedly.
Pop psychology, for a generation who did not freely discuss either sex
or defecation. Shock merchant. Stater of the bleeding obvious in a
funny foriegn accent. Betrug. Scharlatan. in my view
That's not quite fair. Whilst I agree with your final conclusion that Freud was a tosser, there is a hell of a lot more to his theories than can possibly be summed up in a couple of paragraphs.
--
Mel Rimmer
www.bean-sprouts.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- From: robertharvey
- Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- References:
- Worms and meaning thereof
- From: Cerumen
- Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- From: robertharvey
- Worms and meaning thereof
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiple cojbait
- Next by Date: Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- Previous by thread: Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- Next by thread: Re: Worms and meaning thereof
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|