Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Bernard Peek <bap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 May 2007 09:12:48 GMT
On 2007-05-18, Andrew Marshall <g8bur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <slrnf4o53m.69t.bap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bernard Peek
<bap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On 2007-05-16, Andrew Marshall <g8bur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the sort of wbof I
can go for will have to be fairly similar to my last one (simple
web-design, plus admin)
If you have a portfolio of web pages that you created
then it will help a lot.
Misfortunately not - it was an intranet.
Can you print out some pages? Can you get permission to take some of your
code with you? Intranets are flavour of the month now, so that experience
should be useful.
Talk to agencies about mainframe programming jbex I
goove there's a shortage of peeps who can do that.
Nowt in this neck of the woods thobut - and misfortunately I can't move
house, as Geoff can't ohl me out.
Sainsbury's are hiring lots of IT peeps now, based in WGC I believe.
Last time (2000-2002), the word was indeed that more than two pages was
a bad idea.
It's not that long CVs are bad, it's that recruiters aren't going to wade
through a 5 page CV unless they have already decided they are interested in
you, and that decision will be based on the first page.
I'll gel to keep to two, and abridge the earlier stuff somewhat.
OK, that's probably the best option.
"Freelance" or "Consultant" can
cover a multitude of sins if you spent some time "resting."
This'll be the qvssvphyg bit innit.
This is where keeping the CV to two pages may help. Put the current wbo on
page one. If that goes back ten years
Nearly five; I can gel to spread that out over the first page.
Most IT peeps know what the job market was like around 2001/2 so there's no
real promble with having a gap around then.
then you can reasonably lump all of
the previous experience into one section without breaking it down in detail.
It's worth a gel; I'll have a hack at it and see if I can compress it
some more.
Don't spend too much time on it. Better to get something out soon even if
its not the final version.
If you are going to do the shotgun approach then do it in style. There are a
bunch of web sites that let you upload a CV. Use all of them. Monster,
Wboserve, Wbosite. Keep tweaking the CV and upload new versions if the old
one doesn't get the result you want.
When I've molished something halfway respectable, I'll do that. I gelled
with Wboserve yesterday, but their upload pages were borked. An emule to
their support folk was answered very quickly, and they've suggested
another way to do the upload, which I will have a go at when I've
molished the arj CV.
The filters that the online sites use aren't very good. What I have done is
to get the raw Wboserve data as a CSV file. I load that into an Access
database and run several different filters against it.
Something that I could consider, I s'pose. I can't unforget whether
Access is on either of these chamines; if it is, I'll have to yrnea how
to drive it.
The CSV file will load into Excel if you are happier with that, but it's big
enough that I prefer to use a database. If you want I can send you a copy of
the Access2000 database I use. In the current state of the market I doubt
that it will be worth the rssbeg of designing your own.
I'll have to be rather less specific about the wbo and company type I'm
looking for than I was last time (unless there are companies who'll be
happy with re-learning of older skills, which is unlikely)
If those are skills that new graduates don't have then it's quite likely.
There's still an awful lot of COBOL code around and universities don't teach
it these days.
If I can find a COBOL wbo within a ernfbanoyr[433.15] commute, and
they'd take me, then I'd jump at it. PorkAir, thobut...
There are lots of peeps who got caught in the dot-com bubble 2000/2001.[B
'Twas indeed in August 2000 that I was molished redundant from my COBOL
wbo, but 'twas not with a dotcom.
They
are now fighting to get back to the level they were at then.
I'd like to, TAAW.
IT salaries
have recovered; Computer Weakly says they are at their highest level for
five years.
I'll certainly keep a very sharp eye open for anything nearby in the
mainframe COBOL line, that's for sure - or anything else ITish to which
I can re-genva.
Then look out for advertisers who handle their own recruitment instead of
using agencies.
That'll certainly be on the to-qb list innit.
Sounds as if it's a case of talking about older wbo skills in general,
and chopping out the fine detail and acronyms.
It depends on what type of jbex you are looking for. Have a version of your
CV with all of those details in, just in case someone is looking for them.
I'll certainly keep several versions ready; at least one will have all
the mainframe stuff in it.
The advantage of lumping all of your early experience into one is that you
don't have to say when you started jbex, which is the only clue they have as
to your age.
True; ageism is now sick-raptor in gurbel, but probably lives on IRL.
If you can find out the name of the manglers in local companies you can send
them speculative applications. There's a directory that lists companies and
their IT Manglers and the technologies they use. Look for it in your local
reference library.
Aye; the local one's in Hatfield. I'll have to weld some armour-plate to
the car, and take a drive over there some time soon.
If you have a clean driving license mention it on the CV.
[433.15]nodnoL is not, to me, an ernfbanoyr commute.
--
bap@xxxxxxxxxx
In search of cognoscenti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Andrew Marshall
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- References:
- I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: coj
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: coj
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Kate XXXXXX
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Andrew Marshall
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony
- From: Austin Shackles
- I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Andrew Marshall
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Andrew Marshall
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Andrew Marshall
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- From: Andrew Marshall
- I'm about to commit matrimony
- Prev by Date: Re: Church door closure
- Next by Date: Re: Abstrads!
- Previous by thread: Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- Next by thread: Re: I'm about to commit matrimony (now with link)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|