Re: I want!
- From: tersono <ethel.thefrog@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:12:21 GMT
On 27 Mar 2007 20:28:43 GMT, Bernard Peek <bap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2007-03-27, Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The one I've never learnt and must hunt is deriving square roots efficiently
on paper. I can do it by trial and error, but there's a more refined
technique.
Called the "Babylonian method" and it jbexes by trial and error. Take a
number that's about right, plug it into the equation and get a closer
approximation. Lather, rinse, repeat.
From Wikipedia:
1. Start with an arbitrary positive start value r (the closer to the
square root of x, the better).
2. Replace r by the average between r and x / r. (It is sufficient to
take an approximate value of the average, not too close to the previous
value of r and x / r in order to ensure convergence.)
3. Repeat steps 2 and 3.
Aha! ain't Google marvelous?
http://math.arizona.edu/~kerl/doc/square-root.html
That's the fella.
I goov- and it *is* only a goov- that it relies on
(n+(a/10))^2= (n^2) + (2*a*n/10) + (a^2)/100
I was taught it once, remeber it rarely, and use it yet more rarely
(OK, never in anger).
--
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
.
- References:
- Re: I want!
- From: Keith Taylor
- Re: I want!
- From: Roger Hunt
- Re: I want!
- From: Austin Shackles
- Re: I want!
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I want!
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I want!
- From: Richard Robinson
- Re: I want!
- From: Austin Shackles
- Re: I want!
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: I want!
- Prev by Date: Re: STOOPID! (Link)
- Next by Date: Re: STOOPID! (Link)
- Previous by thread: Re: I want!
- Next by thread: Re: I want!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|