Re: charter
- From: Rusty Hinge 2 <rusty.hinge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:39:21 GMT
The message <1h8fvua.1qz8c19103uo1zN%snipe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
from snipe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sn!pe) contains these words:
> coj <c_o_jones_99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Corinthian McVitie Keogh wrote:
> >
> > > Just a .chat suffix group would do, then the main group could be for
> > > sheddy stuff and almost everything that currently gets posted could be
> > > in the chat group
> >
> > Count me in for this separation into two groups.
> > We might even get some old sheddies reappearing in the shed if it
> > happened.
> I'd be all for that. Will the config wallahs wear it?
It's not up to the 'config wallahs' - if there's enough support for a
RFD it goes to a vote. Anyone with a valid address is allowed to vote.
--
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig
.
- References:
- charter
- From: Corinthian McVitie Keogh
- Re: charter
- From: Corinthian McVitie Keogh
- Re: charter
- From: coj
- charter
- Prev by Date: Re: DVD/CD-technosheddi to the bridge please?
- Next by Date: Re: DVD/CD-technosheddi to the bridge please?
- Previous by thread: Re: charter
- Next by thread: Re: charter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|