Re: Coincidence?
- From: Richard Robinson <richardR@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:35:28 -0000
Peter Thomas said:
> In message <bFWof.10535$iz3.9119@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Malc
>>"Peter Thomas" <peterdoubled@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>>> with J*n*t M Ry*n.
>>
>>Who? And again why should we care?
>>
> Richard - would you care to do her justice?
Um. Not really. Unless the invocation brings her here.
It does occur to me that if everybody wishes to contribute to
conversations they're not interested in by recording their lack of
interest, it would contribute greatly to the number of postings here,
without in any way contributing to the interest of anything to those
that are interested. I could molish such comments myself in a lot of
threads, but why should I piss on other peoples' parades if they're
enjoying them ?
I did have kind of a soft spot for Ms. Ry*n, though, some of the time.
If only she could have found a way to molish her points in less than
N hundred lines, or allowed a minute detail to go unpickedup from time
to time, some of them might have had some worthwhile things to say.
She serpently shook a few othodoxies up from time to time. And,
several years later, umf seems a lot more stagnant.
--
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem
My email address is at http://www.qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Coincidence?
- From: Malc
- Re: Coincidence?
- From: Fenny
- Re: Coincidence?
- References:
- Re: Coincidence?
- From: Peter Thomas
- Re: Coincidence?
- From: Malc
- Re: Coincidence?
- From: Peter Thomas
- Re: Coincidence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Goosey Goosey Gander
- Next by Date: Re: techy-pootery...
- Previous by thread: Re: Coincidence?
- Next by thread: Re: Coincidence?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|