Re: Amusing wibble
- From: "Linz" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:19:02 -0000
Gid Holyoake wrote:
> In article <MPG.1df6f8f02052bafe98a3d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
> generously decided to share with us..
>
>> abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said...
>>> In article <MPG.1df6ea0972720e1b98a3cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
>>> generously decided to share with us..
>>>
>>> Snippetry..
>>>
>>>> I have always
>>>> considered that in the case of cyclists to wear or not to wear
>>>> should be a matter of choice; in the case of motorcyclists I'm
>>>> happy to agree to the regulations covering helmets in the same way
>>>> that I support the seat belt laws.
>>>
>>> I'm not.. it all depends on circumstances innit.. if I'm riding long
>>> distances I'm quite happy to don a helmet because it molishes sense
>>> to do so, but pootling around town and such it's a hindrance to
>>> vision and hearing, which are actually quite important..
>>>
>> Note the very careful wording of my last phrase...
>
> If you support the seatbelt laws, then you agree with the immediate
> fine payable if'n you ain't got one on, so preumabubbly you agree
> also with on the spot fines for motorcyclists not wearing an 'elmet..
> or am I missing something?..
She didn't actually say she supported the seatbelt laws. Just that she
supports regulations covering helmets in the same way she supports seatbelt
laws. Which might be 'not at all'.
.
- References:
- Amusing wibble
- From: Just zis Guy, you know?
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Guy King
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Just zis Guy, you know?
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Sena
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Just zis Guy, you know?
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Sena
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Gid Holyoake
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Sena
- Re: Amusing wibble
- From: Gid Holyoake
- Amusing wibble
- Prev by Date: Re: Foopball Shed Door Closure
- Next by Date: Re: Foopball Shed Door Closure
- Previous by thread: Re: Amusing wibble
- Next by thread: Re: Amusing wibble
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|