Re: Amusing wibble

On or around Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:02:55 +0000 (UTC), Gid Holyoake
<abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enlightened us thusly:

>In article <MPG.1df6f8f02052bafe98a3d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
>generously decided to share with us..
>
>> abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said...
>> > In article <MPG.1df6ea0972720e1b98a3cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
>> > generously decided to share with us..
>> >
>> > Snippetry..
>> >
>> > > I have always
>> > > considered that in the case of cyclists to wear or not to wear should be
>> > > a matter of choice; in the case of motorcyclists I'm happy to agree to
>> > > the regulations covering helmets in the same way that I support the seat
>> > > belt laws.
>> >
>> > I'm not.. it all depends on circumstances innit.. if I'm riding long
>> > distances I'm quite happy to don a helmet because it molishes sense to
>> > do so, but pootling around town and such it's a hindrance to vision and
>> > hearing, which are actually quite important..
>> >
>> Note the very careful wording of my last phrase...
>
>If you support the seatbelt laws,

note, though, that arFran has declined to state in what way she supports the
seat belt laws.


Nothing like having a minibus sliding backwards down hill to molish the
anklebiters to suddnely develop an interest in seatbelts. I don't think
they realised how slippery it was 'til then.

one of 'em was whinging 'cos I later spread salt on it.


--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"
Alphonse Karr (1808 - 1890) Les Guêpes, Jan 1849
.