Re: Amusing wibble

In article <MPG.1df6f8f02052bafe98a3d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
generously decided to share with us..

> abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said...
> > In article <MPG.1df6ea0972720e1b98a3cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sena
> > generously decided to share with us..
> >
> > Snippetry..
> >
> > > I have always
> > > considered that in the case of cyclists to wear or not to wear should be
> > > a matter of choice; in the case of motorcyclists I'm happy to agree to
> > > the regulations covering helmets in the same way that I support the seat
> > > belt laws.
> >
> > I'm not.. it all depends on circumstances innit.. if I'm riding long
> > distances I'm quite happy to don a helmet because it molishes sense to
> > do so, but pootling around town and such it's a hindrance to vision and
> > hearing, which are actually quite important..
> >
> Note the very careful wording of my last phrase...

If you support the seatbelt laws, then you agree with the immediate fine
payable if'n you ain't got one on, so preumabubbly you agree also with
on the spot fines for motorcyclists not wearing an 'elmet.. or am I
missing something?..

I won't give a damn if I can ever get my lbooyd trike on the lbooyd
road..

don't need an 'elmet on that innit..

Gid
.