Re: All those poor people
- From: Befunge Sudoku <daviddotbudd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:39:57 +0100
In article <slluh1h7727rv43s2jffgpnd15t0boomt5@xxxxxxx>,
btaySPAMLESSlor2005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>
> I'm really happy to completely ignore "why". To me, there is no "why"
> and I'm so comfortable with it I instantly discard the answers to a,
> to me, non-sensical question. "Why" needs a holiday away from the
> people, there it may have a chance to kill itself in isolation and not
> bother us again.
>
There's a long involved only-understood-by-professional-
philosophers version of why "Why?" isn't a valid question, but
I'll go with wot u sed. Obviously OtherPhilosophers disagree
anyway - it's what they're there for, after all.
--
The Kaiser Chiefs were robbed!
.
- References:
- Re: All those poor people
- From: Guy King
- Re: All those poor people
- From: Befunge Sudoku
- Re: All those poor people
- From: Befunge Sudoku
- Re: All those poor people
- From: JonG
- Re: All those poor people
- From: Austin Shackles
- Re: All those poor people
- From: JonG
- Re: All those poor people
- Prev by Date: Re: All those poor people
- Next by Date: Re: Seen Elsewhere
- Previous by thread: Re: All those poor people
- Next by thread: Re: All those poor people
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|