Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: marc <initialdotsurname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:25:05 +0100
Ewan Scott wrote:
For goodness sake. Why see it as an issue of trust? It is an issue of
reinforcing security. It happens all the time. If there is nothing to
hide then it isn't a problem so long as they don't want us to pay for
the privelige.
Why see it as an issue of trust? Because I do! I see that the local management trust the CRB more than they trust local leaders or themselves. And because they do trust the CRB more how long is it before they start letting their guard slip, howe long before the mindset arrives of "The CRB checked him , he must be alright!"? How long before the yellow card stops mentioning "suspicions" because everyone has been CRB checked?
The CRB check is an aid to recruitment, nothing more , to use it as anythign else is wastefull and creates distortions. If there are problems elsewhere in identifying people who should be workign with YP the CRb shouldn't be used as a sticking plaster soloution.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- References:
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Steve
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Eddie_b
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: marc
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: marc
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: marc
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- Prev by Date: Re: Rotating venues with an Explorer Unit
- Next by Date: virus warning
- Previous by thread: Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- Next by thread: Re: CRBs for all Trustees?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|