Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Ewan Scott <ewanscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:03:07 +0000
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:28:44 +0000, Paul Harris <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <ub0dv25h9tiursl69hms1231p4a9p34qbj@xxxxxxx>, Ewan Scott
<ewanscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Reserves.... now there is an interesting concept. For what do we need
reserves?
Good question. We only need unspecified reserves in case of financial
commitments that are unplanned where we would not have time or income to
meet those commitments in other ways. So those who think that we need a
reserve should be asked what eventuality they think might arise where
the money may be needed at short notice.
How much should we carry as a reserve?
Enough to meet the commitment, now all we have to do is work out what
the potential liability is so that we can put aside sufficient funds.
If we have a reserve
it should be labelled for a purpose - not just left lying around.
Absolutely, although it is possible to have one reserve that could be
used to meet more than one possible scenario on the basis that they
unlikely to all happen at the same time. We still need to identify what
and how much though.
So
if it is labelled, does it also become a pool that can be dipped into
on a whim?
No, if it designated then dipping in is not allowed.
So at what level would you place the cap? Unless the money is for a
I would not only cap District/ County levies, but also cap reserves
that can be held.
purpose how do you decide how much is enough? Someone is bound to
suggest a year or twos income. But what circumstances are there in
which you will need a year or twos income to spend when there is nothing
coming in? Whilst it may appear prudent to have a reserve one should
really know why it is there.
Oh, can you pop along to our DEC on Wednesday night :-)
Ewan Scott
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Paul Harris
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- References:
- Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: bulpitt
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Dave Mayall
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Dave Mayall
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Dave Mayall
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- From: Paul Harris
- Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Paid scout leaders?
- Next by Date: Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- Next by thread: Re: Lower National Membership Fee or More Services from HQ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|